One of the most fundamental challenges for university presidents, deans, department chairs, and research group leaders is to make the best environment for research. Everything else a university does builds on success in doing science.
Tag: leadership
Groups that include both men and women are more intelligent, they achieve greater profitability and they make working environments better. Norway’s segregated workplaces are not optimal.
This is why we need to work to recruit more women to professions in which they are underrepresented — and more men where they are underrepresented. Workplaces that could be better for men and women are one of the topics we discuss today, on International Women’s Day. Read more why you need a woman…
Medical science improves our lives by developing treatments for illnesses. But if a treatment is going to work for everyone, research and testing must be done on a varied population. The challenges of science often lead to just the opposite situation. One way to test if a drug is actually having the hypothesized effect is to give it to several people who are otherwise as similar as possible. Medical treatments may therefore be developed without sufficient testing on both men and women. Read more…
The “obvious” tension between diversity and quality leapt onto the front page this week through a debate at Smith College. And just in case you’re unsure, the putatively obvious connection is that increasing diversity decreases quality.
The debate at Smith presents a new twist on this issue, and it offers at least two lessons to university leaders everywhere. Click here to read these lessons…
Everything we know about improving gender diversity points to one uniquely important success factor. The pursuit of enhanced gender equality flourishes or flounders with the interest and investment of an organization’s top leadership.
To get CEOs on board, they need to believe in the cause themselves; they need to believe that gender diversity matters. We must provide the best arguments we can so the people at the top will care.
Women matter. Women in leadership matter. Women in leadership make companies better. And it isn’t that hard to get more women into leadership positions.
These statements convey the core message of four reports, all called Women matter, that were produced by McKinsey & co. between 2007 and 2010. These reports have become extremely influential, providing basic research for pushing the discussion about gender balance forward. The research results in Woman matter help us argue that creating the circumstances for women to advance is not just right, it’s also smart.
The fourth and final Women Matter report from McKinsey, Women at the top of corporations: making it happen (WM4), gives us good research and a strengthened foundation on which to expand policies and practices.
How will you get the attention of your top leadership? How will you implement development programs and institutionalize the work of gender diversity? Find your answers to these questions. Your organization’s success depends on it!
Organizations that successfully navigate crises have leaders who provide direction and inspire action. Those that survive and flourish after a crisis have leaders who also create an environment for innovation.
An organization’s capacity to lead through and beyond a crisis can be nurtured and enhanced. Increasing gender diversity in the organizations’ leadership team can help. Diversity gives a greater variety of leadership styles. And that variety, especially in a crisis, will contribute to survival.
Search the Archives
Archives by Month
- October 2018
- September 2017
- May 2017
- May 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
Archives by Tag
- Academia
- Adjacent Possible
- Affirmative Action
- Bibliometrics
- Blogging
- Blogs
- Bottleneck Effect
- Cademia
- Change
- Collaboration
- Cooperation
- eBook
- Education
- Egalitarianism
- European Gender Summit
- European Research Council
- Fatherhood
- Fatherhood Bonus
- Featured
- Feminism
- Geder Summit
- Gender
- Gender Balance
- Gendered Innovations
- Gender Equality
- Gender gap
- Gender Summit
- genSET
- Glass Ceiling
- Glass Wall
- Higher Education
- HiOA
- Humanities
- Impact Factor
- Implicit Bias
- Infographic
- Leadership
- Microaggression
- Monarchy
- Motherhood
- Motherhood Penalty
- Nature vs. Nurture
- Nobel Peace Prize
- Nobel Prize
- Norway
- Open Access
- Open Evaluation
- Orchestras
- Peer Evaluation
- Peer Review
- Plagiarism
- Podcast
- Professors
- Promotion
- Publishing
- Quotas
- RealWomenInScience
- Research
- Role Models
- Science
- ScienceGirlThing
- Sexism
- Sheryl Sandberg
- Social Media
- Spain
- STEM
- Strategy
- Stuart Kauffman
- Sweden
- Teamwork
- THAW
- The Netherlands
- The Paradox of Meritocracy
- UK
- Universities
- US
- Video
- Webinar
- Women
- Work/Life Balance
- Writer's Block
- Writing
- Writing and Presenting