Open access and internationalization are the focus of Part 3 of my series on the Norwegian “payment for publication” scheme.
Archives
Open Access
3 simple distinctions your government should eliminate from its research financing system
The Norwegian “payment for publication” scheme treats journals and anthologies differently and does not acknowledge the value of writing textbooks or editing collections. In Part 2 of this series, I argue for correcting these features of the system.
Open Access
Do you make these 6 mistakes? A funding scheme that turns professors into typing monkeys
Here in Part 1 of a 3-part series on the Norwegian “payment for publication” policy, I argue that the two-tier quality system should be dropped.
Even when we try to control for quality, visibility and many other factors, it sometimes seems like the scientific work of men gets more attention than the work of women. Why should it be that way? How can it change?
Open Access
What Science — and the Gonzo Scientist — got wrong: open access will make research better
The “sting” operation published in Science Magazine claims to highlight corruption in the open access model, but it’s actually about problems with peer review — even if Science claims otherwise.
When the top orchestras in the world changed to gender-blind auditions, the number of women hired to play increased dramatically. Could that be possible in other kinds of workplaces, too?
Is there a conflict between academic freedom and open access policies? Or do those policies potential serve to strengthen our freedom?
Three problems with scientific publications are presented here: retraction rates are rising, research is increasingly unreproducible and journals are making decisions designed to increase their visibility.
As my university was about to merge with a college in the same region, I began to sense that expectations were being lowered. I wrote this to encourage maintaining ambition.
Search the Archives
Archives by Month
- October 2018
- September 2017
- May 2017
- May 2016
- December 2015
- October 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
Archives by Tag
- Academia
- Adjacent Possible
- Affirmative Action
- Bibliometrics
- Blogging
- Blogs
- Bottleneck Effect
- Cademia
- Change
- Collaboration
- Cooperation
- eBook
- Education
- Egalitarianism
- European Gender Summit
- European Research Council
- Fatherhood
- Fatherhood Bonus
- Featured
- Feminism
- Geder Summit
- Gender
- Gender Balance
- Gendered Innovations
- Gender Equality
- Gender gap
- Gender Summit
- genSET
- Glass Ceiling
- Glass Wall
- Higher Education
- HiOA
- Humanities
- Impact Factor
- Implicit Bias
- Infographic
- Leadership
- Microaggression
- Monarchy
- Motherhood
- Motherhood Penalty
- Nature vs. Nurture
- Nobel Peace Prize
- Nobel Prize
- Norway
- Open Access
- Open Evaluation
- Orchestras
- Peer Evaluation
- Peer Review
- Plagiarism
- Podcast
- Professors
- Promotion
- Publishing
- Quotas
- RealWomenInScience
- Research
- Role Models
- Science
- ScienceGirlThing
- Sexism
- Sheryl Sandberg
- Social Media
- Spain
- STEM
- Strategy
- Stuart Kauffman
- Sweden
- Teamwork
- THAW
- The Netherlands
- The Paradox of Meritocracy
- UK
- Universities
- US
- Video
- Webinar
- Women
- Work/Life Balance
- Writer's Block
- Writing
- Writing and Presenting