I know guys like you. In fact, I’ve been one, at least when it comes to women and work. You think you’re fair, right? You think the only thing that matters when you hire someone is quality. And you think you know quality when you see it, don’t you?
Tell me your opinion about quotas for hiring women. No, don’t. Let me guess. Quotas definitely flush quality right down the toilet? If a women candidate is better than a man, she’ll get hired. Without a quota. I know that line. We don’t hire the pretty just out of pity, so don’t come around here and start telling me I have to make it easy on someone who can’t get there on her own.
Well, I’ve got bad news for you. Try as you might, you can’t be fair. Difficult as it may be to understand, quotas actually raise quality. And if you want your groups to be smarter, you need gender balance. I’m not just telling you what I think either. I’m telling you what robust, scientific, tested, peer-reviewed research demonstrates.
The editor of AkzoNobel’s A Magazine contacted me a few months ago to commission a piece on gender equality “with attitude.” The text above is the beginning of that article. To read the rest, follow this link to the gorgeous A Magazine website and enjoy a little more attitude. You know you want to!
I encourage you to republish this article online and in print, under the following conditions.
- You have to credit the author.
- If you’re republishing online, you must use our page view counter and link to its appearance here (included in the bottom of the HTML code), and include links from the story. In short, this means you should grab the html code below the post and use all of it.
- Unless otherwise noted, all my pieces here have a Creative Commons Attribution licence -- CC BY 4.0 -- and you must follow the (extremely minimal) conditions of that license.
- Keeping all this in mind, please take this work and spread it wherever it suits you to do so!